<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spewer #5: Michael Moorcock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dfan.org/blog/2009/06/18/spewer-5-michael-moorcock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dfan.org/blog/2009/06/18/spewer-5-michael-moorcock/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Koning</title>
		<link>http://dfan.org/blog/2009/06/18/spewer-5-michael-moorcock/comment-page-1/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Koning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dfan.org/blog/?p=759#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>In terms of visual arts, Picasso seems to me to be the obvious choice -- he made (Wikipedia tells me) 50,000 pieces over 82 years, the best of which are considered by acclamation to be some of the best ever, but a lot of which were pretty slapdash. He worked in a bunch of different styles, but you&#039;ll never mistake a Picasso for someone else&#039;s work. As for his best works being big messes, &lt;a href=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/74/PicassoGuernica.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;well...&lt;/a&gt;

I&#039;m not sure he quite fits the intuitiveness criterion. Of course Cubist portraits have the character of naïve art, but he was a masterful painter in traditional styles when he wanted to be. He did refuse to attend classes at the Real Academia de Madrid; I suspect that had little to do with the instruction cramping his intuitive style, though. Most likely, he had just already absorbed all the knowledge he needed to.

All this &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; he could make girls turn the color of an avocado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of visual arts, Picasso seems to me to be the obvious choice &#8212; he made (Wikipedia tells me) 50,000 pieces over 82 years, the best of which are considered by acclamation to be some of the best ever, but a lot of which were pretty slapdash. He worked in a bunch of different styles, but you&#8217;ll never mistake a Picasso for someone else&#8217;s work. As for his best works being big messes, <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/74/PicassoGuernica.jpg" rel="nofollow">well&#8230;</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure he quite fits the intuitiveness criterion. Of course Cubist portraits have the character of naïve art, but he was a masterful painter in traditional styles when he wanted to be. He did refuse to attend classes at the Real Academia de Madrid; I suspect that had little to do with the instruction cramping his intuitive style, though. Most likely, he had just already absorbed all the knowledge he needed to.</p>
<p>All this <em>and</em> he could make girls turn the color of an avocado.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dfan</title>
		<link>http://dfan.org/blog/2009/06/18/spewer-5-michael-moorcock/comment-page-1/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>dfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dfan.org/blog/?p=759#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>Good one, you are absolutely right!  I have two Fall albums (Hex Enduction Hour and The Wonderful and Frightening World of the Fall) and like them, but was always a little intimidated from exploring them further.  Now that we&#039;re up to six, that makes this a real category and not just a collection of a couple of guys.  Now I need some painters or classical composers or something.  Domenico Scarlatti?  Alan Hovhaness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one, you are absolutely right!  I have two Fall albums (Hex Enduction Hour and The Wonderful and Frightening World of the Fall) and like them, but was always a little intimidated from exploring them further.  Now that we&#8217;re up to six, that makes this a real category and not just a collection of a couple of guys.  Now I need some painters or classical composers or something.  Domenico Scarlatti?  Alan Hovhaness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Koning</title>
		<link>http://dfan.org/blog/2009/06/18/spewer-5-michael-moorcock/comment-page-1/#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Koning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dfan.org/blog/?p=759#comment-3290</guid>
		<description>Possible Spewer candidate, hitherto unmentioned: Mark E. Smith?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possible Spewer candidate, hitherto unmentioned: Mark E. Smith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

